Skip to content
About Us
Home
President’s Welcome
Mission, Vision & Values
People
Organisation
Activities
History
Benefits and Why Us?
Resources
Reviewers
Accreditation Service Fee Guidelines
Submission Calendar
Glossary of Terms
Get Involved (Join Us)
Accreditation
Accreditation General Overview
Schools
School Accreditation Overview
School Eligibility & Candidacy
Guide to School Self-Evaluation
School Accreditation Criteria Overview
School Criteria Details
The School Review Process
Process Timeline & Workflows
How to Apply
Programmes
Programme Accreditation Overview
Programme Eligibility & Candidacy
Guide to Programme Self-Evaluation
Programme Accreditation Criteria Overview
Programme Criteria Details
The Programme Review Process
Process Timeline & Workflows
Programmes: How to Apply
CPD Continuous Professional Development
CPD Accreditation Overview
CPD Accreditation Criteria Overview
CPD Accreditation Process and Workflow
CPD Criteria Details
Quality Review and Progress (QRP)
Accreditation Applicant Evaluation
Reviewer Feedback Evaluation
Advancement
Advancement Overview
Collaboration Overview
Good Practice Sharing
Forthcoming Events
Research Overview
Stakeholder Research
EPHF Monitoring
Trends
NEEDS ASSESSMENT
World Directory
World Directory Overview
2026 ICAPHE World Directory
Key Findings and Analysis
WHO 1985 World Directory
Search for:
Search Button
About Us
Home
President’s Welcome
Mission, Vision & Values
People
Organisation
Activities
History
Benefits and Why Us?
Resources
Reviewers
Accreditation Service Fee Guidelines
Submission Calendar
Glossary of Terms
Get Involved (Join Us)
Accreditation
Accreditation General Overview
Schools
School Accreditation Overview
School Eligibility & Candidacy
Guide to School Self-Evaluation
School Accreditation Criteria Overview
School Criteria Details
The School Review Process
Process Timeline & Workflows
How to Apply
Programmes
Programme Accreditation Overview
Programme Eligibility & Candidacy
Guide to Programme Self-Evaluation
Programme Accreditation Criteria Overview
Programme Criteria Details
The Programme Review Process
Process Timeline & Workflows
Programmes: How to Apply
CPD Continuous Professional Development
CPD Accreditation Overview
CPD Accreditation Criteria Overview
CPD Accreditation Process and Workflow
CPD Criteria Details
Quality Review and Progress (QRP)
Accreditation Applicant Evaluation
Reviewer Feedback Evaluation
Advancement
Advancement Overview
Collaboration Overview
Good Practice Sharing
Forthcoming Events
Research Overview
Stakeholder Research
EPHF Monitoring
Trends
NEEDS ASSESSMENT
World Directory
World Directory Overview
2026 ICAPHE World Directory
Key Findings and Analysis
WHO 1985 World Directory
Search for:
Search Button
Accreditation Reviewer Feedback Evaluation
There was an error trying to submit your form. Please try again.
Reviewer & Review Context
Please enter your name
*
This field is required.
What was the review you took part in?
*
This field is required.
What type of review did you participate in?
On site
Online
Hybrid
Paper-based
What was your role in the review?
Chair
Reviewer
Student Reviewer
Pre-Review Preparation
How clear and sufficient was the pre-review documentation provided by the applicant?
Very clear
Clear
Somewhat Clear
Unclear
How useful was the pre-review meeting in preparing you for the review?
Very useful
Useful
Somewhat useful
Not useful
Review Process
How would you rate the organisation and structure of the review process?
Excellent
Good
Adequate
Was your role clearly defined and supported throughout the review?
Yes, completely
Yes, somewhat
Not really
Were you able to contribute meaningfully to interviews, observations and discussions?
Yes, fully
Yes, somewhat
Not really
Tools and Communication
How would you rate the tools or platforms used (for online/hybrid reviews)?
Excellent
Good
Adequate
Poor
Not applicable
How effective was communication among Review Panel members?
Very effective
Effective
Somewhat effective
ineffective
Reporting and Outcomes
Do you feel the review process allowed for fair and accurate assessment of the applicant?
Yes
Mostly
Uncertain
Not really
Was the process of drafting or contributing to the report well managed?
Yes, very well
Yes, to a degree
Not really
Overall Experience
Overall, how would you rate your experience as a reviewer?
Excellent
Good
Satisfactory
Poor
Do you have any suggestions for how ICAPHE could better support Review Chairs or Reviewers?
In your opinion, what worked and what didn't and can be improved?
Would you like to be contacted regarding your feedback? If yes, please provide your email address.
This field is required.
GDPR COMPLIANCE: This form and site will not store user IP, Browser name, device name, entries or any other data. However, your email will be retained by ICAPHE for contact and confirmation receipt of your input.
*
This field is required.
Submit
There was an error trying to submit your form. Please try again.
error: