Skip to content
About Us
Home
President’s Welcome
Mission, Vision & Values
People
Organisation
Activities
History
Benefits and Why Us?
Resources
Reviewers
Accreditation Service Fee Guidelines
Submission Calendar
Glossary of Terms
Get Involved (Join Us)
Accreditation
Accreditation General Overview
Schools
School Accreditation Overview
School Eligibility & Candidacy
Guide to School Self-Evaluation
School Accreditation Criteria Overview
School Criteria Details
The School Review Process
Process Timeline & Workflows
How to Apply
Programmes
Programme Accreditation Overview
Programme Eligibility & Candidacy
Guide to Programme Self-Evaluation
Programme Accreditation Criteria Overview
Programme Criteria Details
The Programme Review Process
Process Timeline & Workflows
Programmes: How to Apply
CPD Continuous Professional Development
CPD Accreditation Overview
CPD Accreditation Criteria Overview
CPD Accreditation Process and Workflow
CPD Criteria Details
Quality Review and Progress (QRP)
Accreditation Applicant Evaluation
Reviewer Feedback Evaluation
Advancement
Advancement Overview
Collaboration Overview
Good Practice Sharing
Forthcoming Events
Research Overview
Stakeholder Research
EPHF Monitoring
Trends
NEEDS ASSESSMENT
World Directory
World Directory Overview
2026 ICAPHE World Directory
Key Findings and Analysis
WHO 1985 World Directory
Search for:
Search Button
About Us
Home
President’s Welcome
Mission, Vision & Values
People
Organisation
Activities
History
Benefits and Why Us?
Resources
Reviewers
Accreditation Service Fee Guidelines
Submission Calendar
Glossary of Terms
Get Involved (Join Us)
Accreditation
Accreditation General Overview
Schools
School Accreditation Overview
School Eligibility & Candidacy
Guide to School Self-Evaluation
School Accreditation Criteria Overview
School Criteria Details
The School Review Process
Process Timeline & Workflows
How to Apply
Programmes
Programme Accreditation Overview
Programme Eligibility & Candidacy
Guide to Programme Self-Evaluation
Programme Accreditation Criteria Overview
Programme Criteria Details
The Programme Review Process
Process Timeline & Workflows
Programmes: How to Apply
CPD Continuous Professional Development
CPD Accreditation Overview
CPD Accreditation Criteria Overview
CPD Accreditation Process and Workflow
CPD Criteria Details
Quality Review and Progress (QRP)
Accreditation Applicant Evaluation
Reviewer Feedback Evaluation
Advancement
Advancement Overview
Collaboration Overview
Good Practice Sharing
Forthcoming Events
Research Overview
Stakeholder Research
EPHF Monitoring
Trends
NEEDS ASSESSMENT
World Directory
World Directory Overview
2026 ICAPHE World Directory
Key Findings and Analysis
WHO 1985 World Directory
Search for:
Search Button
Accreditation Applicant Evaluation
There was an error trying to submit your form. Please try again.
Applicant Context
Title of School / Programme / Course under Review
This field is required.
Name of Institution
This field is required.
What type of review did you undergo?
On site
Online
Hybrid
Paper-based
Name of person completing this evaluation
This field is required.
Date of review
This field is required.
Overall Experience
How would you rate the organisation and structure of the review process?
Excellent
Good
Satisfactory
Poor
Comments (optional):
What worked well or what didn’t work well? Were your expectations met?
This field is required.
Communication and Support
How would you rate the clarity and helpfulness of communication throughout the accreditation process?
Excellent
Good
Satisfactory
Poor
Comments (optional):
Was information provided in a timely, friendly and professional manner?
This field is required.
Eligibility
How applicable did you find the eligibility criteria?
Very applicable
Applicable
Somewhat applicable
Not applicable
Comments (optional):
Were the instructions clear and were they suitable for your preparation and understanding?
This field is required.
Documentation and Guidance
How useful did you find the self-evaluation guidance and documentation provided?
Very useful
Useful
Somewhat useful
Not useful
Comments (optional):
Were the instructions clear and were they suitable for your preparation and understanding?
This field is required.
Review Team Interaction
How would you describe your interaction with the review team?
Excellent
Good
Satisfactory
Poor
Comments (optional):
Was the review process respectful, collaborative and constructive?
This field is required.
Usefulness of Feedback
Did the reviewers and final report provide meaningful feedback for future planning and quality improvement?
Yes, very useful
Somewhat useful
not especailly useful
Comments (optional):
Did the findings feel fair, balanced and relevant to your context?
This field is required.
Suggestions for Improvement
Comments (optional):
What could we improve in future accreditation cycles?
(e.g. process clarity, timelines, feedback style, reviewer matching, digital tools)
This field is required.
Final Thoughts
Do you have any other feedback you’d like to share?
This field is required.
Would you like to be contacted regarding your feedback? If yes, please provide your email address.
This field is required.
GDPR COMPLIANCE: This form and site will not store user IP, Browser name, device name, entries or any other data. However, your email will be retained by ICAPHE for contact and confirmation receipt of your input.
*
This field is required.
Submit
There was an error trying to submit your form. Please try again.
© ICAPHE 2025
error:
